> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://zebra.gitbook.io/zebra-document/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://zebra.gitbook.io/zebra-document/q-and-a/why-is-my-liquidity-position-not-evenly-split-between-the-two-tokens.md).

# Why is my liquidity position not evenly split between the two tokens?

**An unbalanced deposit amount occurs when your price range is not evenly split around the market price.**

\
It may not be possible to balance your liquidity position due to the tick spacing of a pool. This is because the size of the [tick spacing](https://support.uniswap.org/hc/en-us/articles/21069524840589) is relative to the [fee tier.](/zebra-document/q-and-a/what-are-fee-tiers.md) The amounts required will depend on the tick spacing and the current price.

 

To deposit at roughly 50/50 values, a user has to find two ticks that are equal spacing on both sides of the current price.

 

**Here is an example of tick spacing impacting a liquidity position:** If the current price of an asset is 1,879, an evenly split deposit with a +/- 1% range would need prices at 1,859.8 and 1,898.7.

<figure><img src="/files/CDAp0Snu9l4KnDu4Vy4N" alt=""><figcaption><p>Here is an example of tick spacing impacting a liquidity position.</p></figcaption></figure>

The deposit amounts will only be evenly split if they are evenly spaced ticks.

&#x20;

Due to tick spacing, there may not be ticks at exactly 1,860 and 1,898, which produces an even deposit value. Learn more about why the price input automatically rounds here: [Why does the price input automatically round?](/zebra-document/q-and-a/why-does-the-price-input-automatically-round.md)

<br>